#APPLE IWEB TEMPLATES UPDATE#
#APPLE IWEB TEMPLATES FULL#
#APPLE IWEB TEMPLATES PC#

As an example for that you can see You know the funny thing of it all is, when I had version 1 I was even able to edit my entire site in the right display in dreamweaver or golive, but after the first update this became an impossibility. After that I did another test, to see if you turn your first page title into index, and so not create an iweb created index. What is really strange after I updated Iweb to version 2 and uploaden the same page, it loads a lot slower then the uploaded version with version 1.02.ДЄs proof visit is the old version with 1.02 and the new version. In the meantime, RapidWeaver, Sandvox, and iWeb '06 are good alternatives. Unfortunately I can't recommend it unless they issue a major fix. IWeb '06 1.1.2 was great, but this one needs much work!

#APPLE IWEB TEMPLATES FULL#

I've given this feedback to Apple and posted this on their support forum which is full of many similar and other complaints on iWeb '08. It's no longer WYSIWYG like iWeb '06/1.x was. The process of publishing the pages is changing fonts and spacing so that the published pages are far different than the unpublished pages. But when I publish the pages several font and spacing changes are made in the published pages different from the changes I corrected in converting a '06 site to '08, mainly: some fonts are converted to bold and spacing changes are made so that it is no longer WYSIWYG: the pages in iWeb still look great, the published pages look terrible and unusable. I went thru and corrected the changes, mainly font & spacing changes until it resembled the site I created and saved. I didn't move or rename my site, I opened it in 2.0.1 which had made a few changes to the '06 created pages. I didn't start using '08 until the 2.0.1 fix was issued, so this is all under 2.0.1. My small business site I created in iWeb 06 is not rendering correctly in iWeb '08 2.0.1 But only to warn people not to buy iWeb/iLife until they get the bugs fixed in iWeb '08. I can't believe I'm giving a negative rating to an Apple product, this is a first.

Otherwise I have to come up with really obscure titles for my subpages, because I can't just call them what I want to. So please Apple, at least make iWeb 08 change URLs that contain less compatible characters that wont work in most peoples browsers. I then name the page something like '365 dage' (365 days) because then it will work and most people will know what that page is about, but it shouldn't have to to be like that. my daughters 1 year birthday is named '1 ГҐrs fГёdselsdag' (1 year birthday) and when that show up in the URL as no one except Safari users will be able to see that page. That is a very big problem, because I'm from Denmark I use the danish characters Г¦, Гё and ГҐ in my webpage titles, and you can guess what happens when Г¦, Гё or ГҐ is included in the URL. The URL of subpages made with iWeb 08 will now be called exactly the same as what you call that subpage - the name that also shows in your navigation menu. I guess the iWeb team has listened to costumers about the very cryptic URLs in iWeb 06, but the change they have made in iWeb 08, to compensate for that, is just to simplified.

The only way to fix this is to delete the offending item, save, quit, reboot, add it back and republish!ДЄpple needs to apply some knowledgeable programmers to this application and to thoroughly test it prior to release before I would give it the rating that the 'professional' reviewers have.

My main problem with this latest version of the application is its tendency to screw up text and text hyperlinks in a random fashion.

#APPLE IWEB TEMPLATES PC#

Until the iWeb FTP actually works, optimization and SEO functionality are added and MobileMe is given a radical overhaul, the only option is to publish to a local folder if you want your site to be findable and viewable on a PC running IE. It makes you wonder if they have actually used the application. I find it astounding that reviewers for certain well known publications are reporting positively. IWeb is basically a good application - it just needs to be made to work out of the box and be developed in the same way as its main competition. IWeb still doesn't include the features that a lot of users have requested and the main one they added, the dysfunctional FTP, is a disaster for many. From the response of users in the iWeb forum, it seems that the long awaited bug fix doesn't really fix anything very much at all.

Apple iweb templates